I want to take this opportunity of
expressing our appreciation of the European Movement's work. They have carried the torch
for the European idea. And it has often been a lonely task.
There's one year that's uppermost in our minds today 1957. It was the year
Ghana and Malaya became independent. It was the year Sputnik was launched and space
became the new frontier of all mankind. It was the year John Lennon and Paul McCartney met
for the first time. And of course 1957 was the year the Treaty of Rome was signed.
It didn't cause much of a stir at the time. As with the Beatles, it took some time for the
music to filter through.
But once it did, the Treaty of Rome became something we couldn't have lived without
even if we take it for granted now.
A couple of weeks ago you may have seen Manchester United play against a European
Eleven at Old Trafford. The match was organised to celebrate half a century of Manchester
United competition in Europe as well as to mark the signing of the Treaty of Rome.
Commissioner Siim Kallas, the former Estonian Prime Minister, was there, and he was very
keen to meet Bobby Charlton, whom he had only ever seen on TV. He told me how he used to
watch Finnish TV because it was the only western TV channel they could receive behind the
Iron Curtain.
Enlargement has meant an awful lot to them. It's meant an incredible opening-up to the
world. The breaking-down of so many barriers. It's meant democracy and freedom. Freedom to
watch the TV channels you want and travel abroad wherever and whenever you want. We
should never underestimate what European integration has meant reconciliation
between former enemies, the underpinning of peace and democracy, and the creation of new
economic relations.
For people in the UK, the benefits may seem less tangible. Especially in political terms.
Of course, there are the three million jobs the government attributes to UK membership of
the EU at a cost per person in 2006 of about one espresso coffee a week. When
the UK joined in 1973, it was called the "sick man of Europe". Now it's the
worlds fifth-largest economy. I suspect the three million jobs and the EU's single
market the largest in terms of GDP in the world may have something to do
with that.
Now we know that the EU budget isn't a kitty: it funds our common policies. So you can't
expect to get out exactly what you put in.
I couldn't put a precise figure on the value of so many things the EU does
such as food safety and disease control and standards for drinking water and cleaner
beaches. Such as entitlement to health care abroad thanks to the European Health
Insurance Card and the right to draw one's pension anywhere in the EU. Such as cheaper air
travel since the EU opened up air transport to competition. I couldn't put a precise
figure on technical benefits such as the GSM standard developed by EU-funded research that
allows mobile 'phone systems to talk to each other across Europe. But we can say it has
become the globally dominant worldwide standard and 82% of the world's mobile users have
phones based on it.
I can't put a figure on such political benefits as the underpinning of democracy
across Europe, the stabilisation of peace in the Balkans, EU humanitarian aid to tsunami
victims in the Indian Ocean and EU development aid across the world's poorer countries.
Yet we finance all of these and much more through the EU budget. And I would
venture to say we all get more back in intangible but very real benefits than we put in.
The EU is the world's foremost aid donor. That means we can all feel proud of our
collective contribution to aiding people across the developing world. For that espresso
coffee a week, you don't just get three million jobs in the UK. You get a world role and a
voice in global politics and the satisfaction of knowing we can defend and promote our
shared values on the world stage. Because together our 27 member states are stronger than
any one is or could be individually.
|
continued in right-hand column
|
As we together
face global challenges globalisation, climate change, terrorism, the curse of HIV
AIDS particularly in the developing world Europe needs to fit itself economically
and politically for these tasks. And, despite what you may think, the indications
are that people across the EU including here in the UK support more
decision-making at European level on certain global issues.
A Eurobarometer survey published in December last year found these figures:
55% of people in the UK are in favour of more decision-making at EU level on the
environment.
61% believe there is a real need for decisions in the fight against terrorism to be
made jointly within the EU.
In these areas, there is scope for decision-making at EU level with strong support from
both people and government in the UK.
If the UK wants to act effectively to tackle these problems, then it can only do it
through the EU. But if it wants the EU to be able to meet these challenges effectively,
then people need to understand what the EU stands for. And to make the EU work
effectively, we need an institutional settlement. Given the risks and the evidence
available, putting ones trust in action at national level is like King Canute
ordering the tide to stop.
At the last European Council meeting in Brussels a fortnight ago, we saw firm agreement on
some of these issues.
The heads of state and government agreed on an integrated climate and energy policy backed
up by an action plan. They set a number of groundbreaking political targets:
On climate change, the EU has committed to cutting greenhouse gas emissions by 2020
by at least 20% over 1990 levels.
On the Single Market for gas and electricity, it has agreed on the need to separate
supply and production activities.
On renewable sources of energy, it has set a binding target of 20% by 2020.
These targets follow up the Commission's package of energy and climate-change
measures announced in January. They show that the EU is determined to continue leading in
building international consensus on combating climate change. It's worth stressing
the fact that climate-change measures can be an opportunity, not just a challenge. And the
technological lead will translate into economic opportunities too. Developing the
necessary technology can ensure that Europe takes the lead technologically.
But setting targets is just the start. European leadership also means Europe-wide laws and
decisions as opposed to British or French or Finnish laws. And that means it needs to take
the lead politically in order to translate these targets into action internationally and
have impact at world level.
The European Union is a work in progress. From a grouping of six countries dealing
mainly with agriculture, coal and steel, and nuclear power, it has developed into today's
EU of 27 members dealing with a huge range of issues. Issues that concern Europeans and
that we need to tackle together, on the basis of our shared values.
Some have said that the EU is suffering from a "mid-life crisis". But can you
call it a crisis when you've 12 new members in the last three years and others are queuing
up to join? When you're the world's largest trading bloc with an internal market of around
half a billion? When you're making substantial progress towards joint decision-making on
justice and home affairs, security and defence? When your institutions are held up
as a model and emulated in South-East Asia, Africa and South America? When your
organisation generates prosperity and political stability among your neighbours beyond its
borders, sets world standards and successfully exports its values around the globe?
Let me wind up with two points.
First, today is a day to look back, but even more it's a day to look forward. Lewis
Carroll said: "It's a poor sort of memory that only works backwards." The EU's
achievements are there for all to see. We should never take them for granted. Now we need
to look to the challenges ahead. They will not be resolved on their own.
Second, you don't need to love the EU. Someone said the verb "to love" is
the most complicated in any language. Its past is never simple, its present is imperfect
and its future is always conditional. So it's asking a lot to love the EU. But we do
need the EU to tackle the challenges facing us and those that will face us
in the next 50 years. And it's up to all us Europeans especially our young people
to make it work. |